Companies listed on the NYSE are subject to the Corporate Governance Standards of Section 303A (the NYSE Standards) of the NYSE Listed Company Manual. Under the NYSE Standards, Siemens AG, as a foreign private issuer, is permitted to follow its home-country corporate governance practices in lieu of the NYSE Standards, except that it is required to comply with the NYSE Standards relating to the having of an audit committee (comprised of members who are “independent” under the SOA) and to certain NYSE notification obligations. In addition, the NYSE Standards require that foreign private issuers disclose any significant ways in which their corporate governance practices differ from those required of U.S. domestic companies under the NYSE Standards.
As a company incorporated in Germany, Siemens AG has to comply with the German law applicable to stock corporations (primarily the German Stock Corporation Act) and the German Codetermination Act and follows the recommendations of the German Corporate Governance Code. Furthermore, Siemens complies with applicable rules and regulations of the markets on which its securities are listed, such as the NYSE, and also voluntarily complies with many of the NYSE requirements that by their terms apply only to U.S. domestic issuers.
The significant differences between our governance practices and those of U.S. domestic NYSE issuers are as follows:
The German Stock Corporation Act requires Siemens AG to have a two-tier board structure consisting of a Managing Board and a Supervisory Board. The two-tier system provides a strict separation of management and supervision. Roles and responsibilities of each of the two boards are clearly defined by law. The composition of the Supervisory Board is determined in accordance with the Codetermination Act, which requires that one-half of the required 20 Supervisory Board members must be elected by our domestic employees. In the event of a tie vote at the Supervisory Board, the Chairman of the Supervisory Board is entitled to cast a deciding vote.
In contrast to the NYSE Standards, which require the board to affirmatively determine the independence of the individual directors with reference to specific tests of independence, German law does not require the Supervisory Board to make such affirmative findings on an individual basis. At the same time, the Bylaws for Siemens’ Supervisory Board contain several provisions to help ensure the independence of the Supervisory Board’s advice and supervision. Furthermore, the members of the Supervisory and Managing Boards are strictly independent from one another; a member of one board is legally prohibited from being concurrently active on the other. Supervisory Board members have independent decision-making authority and are legally prohibited from following the direction or instruction of any affiliated party. Moreover, Supervisory Board members may not enter into advisory, service or certain other contracts with Siemens, unless approved by the Supervisory Board.
In contrast to the NYSE Standards, which require the creation of several specified board committees, composed of independent directors and operating pursuant to written charters that set forth their tasks and responsibilities, the Supervisory Board of Siemens AG has combined the functions of a nominating, compensation and corporate governance committee substantially in the Chairman’s Committee and has delegated the remaining functions to the Nominating Committee. Both the Audit Committee and the Chairman’s Committee have written bylaws – adopted by the Supervisory Board based on the NYSE Standards – addressing their respective purposes and responsibilities.
The Audit Committee of Siemens AG is subject to the standards of the SOA and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as applicable to a foreign private issuer, and performs – in cooperation with the recently established Compliance Committee – functions similar to those of an audit committee subject to the full NYSE Standards. Nevertheless, German law precludes certain responsibilities from being delegated to a committee, such as the selection of the independent auditors, who are required by German law to be elected at the shareholders’ meeting.
In addition, the Supervisory Board of Siemens AG has an Ownership Rights Committee and a Mediation Committee, the latter of which is required by German law. Neither of these two committees is required under the NYSE Standards.
The NYSE Standards generally require U.S. domestic companies listed on the NYSE to obtain shareholder approval of all equity compensation plans (including stock option plans) and any material revisions to them. Similarly, our adoption of stock option plans and any material revisions thereto require the approval by our shareholders insofar as any issuance of shares and/or stock options under authorized or contingent capital authorizations requires shareholder approval (which approval requires consideration of the key elements of the applicable option plan or relevant modifications). The 2001 Siemens Stock Option Plan, for example, under which no further options can be issued after December 2006, was approved in 2001 by our shareholders. Similarly, under German law, share buybacks generally require the prior authorization by shareholders. Such approval was provided at our January 25, 2007 Annual Shareholders’ Meeting, and this matter will generally be voted upon annually.
Thank you for viewing Siemens' Annual Report 2007.
If you require further information, please contact us:
Telephone
+49 89 636-33032 (Press Office)
+49 89 636-32474 (Investor Relations)
Telefax
+49 89 636-30085 (Press Office)
+49 89 636-32830 (Investor Relations)